Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Itunes System Has Been Modified

Pedemonatana

Send request to the City Cat.

================================================ ================

in Felino, July 17, 2008

Respectable. Comune di Felino

about Mayor Lori Barbara

pc and the citizens must

variant of the new road Pedemontana

Analysis of ' workshop of ideas and comparison

The new road "piedmont" is scheduled on the maps of the municipalities and the Province for 30 years.

In the years 2003 - 2004 , in the interest of the City followed the Felino, was drafted by the Administration Provincial feasibility study for the path across our province, dall'Enza to Taro.

The project was presented by the Provincial Administration (owner of the work) to the common interest (Traversetolo, Montechiarugolo, Parma, Langport, Felino, and Collecchio Baganza Hall) in March 2004 positive feedback.

The City of Cat presented the project to City Council in April 2004 with measures of consensus and satisfaction of all groups of the Board.

The local elections of June 2004 was not possible to introduce the project to the citizens who waited this long to solve the problem of traffic.

April 2005 PRG in a variant of the Municipal Administration has included the modification of the route the road axis.

variant of PRG was adopted without a public announcement and in any case without the minimum of information and transparency that the Regional Law 47/78 provides for urban development.

The process variant planning today is not concluded, and action split the new road started: Traversetolo bypass and link road to the Pillar.

The funding for the section-Pillar Felino is provided in the regional budget for 2009, with the hope that the process of urban variant is completed and available to the executive plan.

From history, from the deepening and public debate to 20.6 us the group draws some considerations.

The changed path, compared to the original, is less straight, has a greater impact on the environment and significantly penalizes some of the most important agricultural and livestock activities in the area .

The resolution of adoption of the variant (n.ro 11 April 24 2005) has no documentation justifying the need to change the location of the track and also from the actions of the technicians, the Mayor, Councillors and Municipal Councillors is not no sign of an act so important.

than required previously, we believe that the position of the Provincial Administration has changed since in all variants of PRG it fair to require strict compliance by the municipalities of the constraints imposed by track road axis Pedemontano and attention in relation to 'use of available land for agricultural purposes.

The motivation to implement a new route the road axis Pedemontano says the response to the Mayor ' workshop of ideas and comparison (memo of May 17, 2008, prot. 5648): "... the town council has seen fit to remove the location of new roads from the towns and Felino S. Michele Tiorre for both close-in areas already established with special attention to residential and to ensure a space for possible future expansion ... .

contradictory reasoning as:

  • the towns have developed in accordance with the PRG that has always considered the presence of the new road and its distance required by zoning regulations and respect the highway code;
  • can not be said that the road network runs in proximity to settled areas and then claiming that the new space that becomes available will ensure the possibility of future expansion, if only because the future expansion generate the current situation.

Over the April 2007 public meeting in which they were briefly described the decisions taken have not been promoted for the citizens of other opportunities for information, listening and debate at the stage which were forming. It appears that the petition sent on 02.07.2005, signed by 90 signatories, and comments to the adoption of variant still awaiting a response.

The Mayor's response to our requests for clarification on the track in the foothills not was considered fully by the group, even after the public debate to 20.6 us. Have not been systematically examined all the issues raised and, above all. the reasons are too general in 2005 that led to the modification of the original route.

However, since the situation seems irreversible as a variant of the process has not ended after more than three years and is therefore unthinkable to return to the original route, L ' workshop of ideas and comparison , after having analyzed and debated the problem, proposes the following.

1) Okay, quickly, the adoption of alternative routes by the Municipality and the response to the comments.

2) A technical study of the fast track to assess specifically the opportunity to roundabout intersections with local roads in Via Marconi and Rome Road (route submitted by the provincial Ugo damage), as well as designed the layout is lacking also in terms of functionality. To do this will be useful to study the viability of the municipality to find the most suitable technical solutions and in favor of a good interaction between the new road network and roads and the villages of San Michele Tiorre Felino.

3) a working group to design with the owners of agricultural land, which are opposing the alternative routes in order to promote solutions that can prevent the actions the TAR.

4) made certain that the "strap" (scheduled PIO08) lies within the overall funding of the work and therefore do not weigh upon the Administration Comunale di Felino.

5) all the procedures so that the work of the section-Pillar Felino can begin within the month of July 2009 just as they can be assured the Regional Minister Alfredo Peri Provincial Councillor Hugh damage.

6) The answer to the petition and observations mentioned above.

Thank you for your attention, Best regards.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

How Can I Unblock Runescape?

Summary of the meeting of July 8, 2008.

We reviewed the summary document of our company. analysis on the foothills, which will be delivered to the City.

Situation Play: Once the decal is available for identification will begin its use.


We also decided to suspend meetings in August and the next will be Thursday, September 11.

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Franchising Proposal Sample

requested from the City Commercial Centre for Conad

Send request to the City Cat.

================================================ ==================

in Felino, July 2, 2008

Respectable. Comune di Felino

about Mayor Lori Barbara

and PC to Citizens

Subject: mall CONAD

(Application to the Mayor pursuant to Article 38, comma2, the Statute of the City of Felino)


The public meeting Thursday, 9.6 us for the presentation of such subject matter has caused in our group a series of reflections and questions that we communicate and what we hope for a response.


The questions cover one side of the balance in services between the new development and the shops of the "square Miodini and around" the other the environmental impact of more than 8,000 square meters on which you develop the mall.


The birth of the mall in PIO02 and any resulting displacement of businesses within it, if not regulated by compensatory actions of regulatory, organizational and economic, can impoverish the life of the city center and private service logistically comfortable band of elderly and disadvantaged population.

The timing of completion, which will be illustrated by the rapid, requiring a fast design and implementation of such actions balanced.


The interesting project Thinking Cat well you can give the definition of the role of business in the "square and surrounding area." After the first set of meetings, the public presentation of the last months of 2007 and the announcement of a second set of interviews have not been disclosed further developments of the study.


Then we ask "the state of the art" thinking on the draft Felino.


The presentation of the work on the part of the project was limited in that evening, to considerations of planning, logistics and aesthetic. Have not been outlined what solutions will be taken to limit its environmental impact and promote energy savings.

So the questions we ask are:

  • There are solar panels and / or solar?
  • What building materials are provided?
  • The heating / cooling of What type are they? How do you feed?
  • are expected recoveries of water?
  • E 'provided a breakdown of the ducts black water / white water / gray water?
  • Rainwater parking is to lose?
  • provides parking floors to reduce the impermeable surface?


This series of questions intended as a stimulus, so that the Town Council makes reward to anyone who wants to design and build a Cat adoption of suitable measures for energy savings and environmental (eg the future PIO01).


Thank you for your attention, Best regards.


workshop of ideas and comparison

(Luigi Fereol)

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

Bioessence Face Slimming Cream

Summary of the meeting of June 26, 2008.

During the evening we discussed on the following topics.

1) Questions on the now imminent PIO02 Conad or shopping mall.

After the public meeting on the subject by 9.6 will send the City a series of questions and demands to limit the environmental impact is both on the existing commercial structure Miodini Square.

2) Track foothills.

The positive public meeting to 20.6 in San Michele Tiorre issue has in a sense come full circle in our thinking.

One side has clarified the administrative aspects (2 months within which the municipality must declare yards the path to make sure funding) and has allowed us to know the whole project over town.
unexpected and innovative is the possibility of almost certain intersections (roundabouts) Via Marconi Road and Rome: a modality always excluded. This choice has advantages of cost and less impact than over / under hand.
There are still concerns about fitting into the future PIO08: it is not clear who was responsible for the cost of considerable work. Just as it has not been sufficiently explained the process that led to the change of the path with the variation of April 2005.
Do not forget the determined opposition and appeals yet by some individuals.
remains confirmed our concerns about the possible increase of construction that allows the new path.

The public meeting is respect for a referral to the Secretary of the PD Cat had made to us in an evening of debate.
This meeting is the confirmation that we reopen the discussion on track on handling the questions asked have been essential to provide an opportunity for public information and education. In short it is "political .

To summarize our analysis in public in a report which will be concluded with a series of proposals to ensure better implementation of the work.


3) Environment and waste.

A first overview of the topic, which will continue at the next meeting.

The certainty, however, that the environment is not a stand-alone subject but must pervade any administrative act.